A first stab at describing how I see race in the U.S. informed by experiences as an Asian. My experiences with racism involve both experiencing it firsthand and being largely protected from it. I think Asian-Americans tend to have the effect of thwarting white racial supremacy beliefs. And I think the Asian-American ethnic category is kind of bizarre and fake but also can be an uplifting symbol of solidarity capable of transcending nations, language, and histories of violence and oppression.
This book is a detailed analysis of the puzzle of why (some) marriages in the U.S. are becoming increasingly unstable. It argues that changes in job opportunities create bifurcated marriage markets which lead to bifurcated marriage behavior. In doing so, the book touches on issues of gender, race, and class, and argues that this bifurcated marriage behavior can exacerbate societal inequality.
The benefits of intersectionality I put forward are more apparent when given math analogies. Set intersection provides an easy reminder that choosing both is a wise idea. Conceptualizing oppression as a multidimensional space discourages Oppression Olympics. Intersectional analyses are good/responsible practice in the same way that checking for and reporting significant interactions is in statistical analysis.
Intersectionality is a fairly recent buzzword in the social justice left that is often accused of being divisive and the root of puritan perfectionism. I argue why intersectionality is (1) the opposite of those things, at least in my experience, and (2) necessary for making the world a better place.